Cook county, IL has an interesting monopoly on the public records data. Highly populated and active because of proximity to Chicago, the county knows people need their data. Here is the interesting part: They are competing with private real estate records providers. If a lender servicing company needs access to the records to pay taxes, the cost is $60,000 per year. So with 10 customers the county brings in $6,000,000 annually
In their
data base subscription agreement they state:
"Neither the Bulk Commercial User nor any Authorized User (as defined below) shall have any right, title or interest in the Database. Except as provided above, neither the Bulk Commercial User nor any Authorized User shall copy, reproduce, duplicate, publish, disclose, distribute, license, sub-license, relicense, use as the basis for a derivative database, assign, release, transfer, sell or otherwise make the Database available to any other organization or person in any form or manner whatsoever."Also, the county requires indemnification against errors. Caveat Emptor, I assume.
First American went up against Cook County, attempting to reduce or eliminate the large fees for access to the records.
See Article. Not much movement was made towards a fair fee.
So to sum up:
- The county is the ONLY original source for the data.
- The county is not held accountable for the accuracy of the information.
- The county charges and arm and a leg for the data.
- The county is preventing access to the data through technological means.
The county does incur a cost in maintaining the data which they should be compensated for, but in Florida, the cost for a same size county (Miami-Dade) is $5,000 to $6,000 per year. Unless the data has magical powers, I don't see how they can legitimately charge $60,000 for bulk access to the data.
Take this senario:
I am an appraiser working in Cook County. I need to list comparable sales for a property. I have access to the county records and create my comparable list. Once I have created the appraisal I receive payment for it. Haven’t I essentially violated the access codes? I used the data from Cook County to produce an appraisal that I have sold.
-- or --
What if I am writing a news article on real estate sales for Cook county. I review the data and derive total home sales for the past year. I print this article in the news paper. The news paper sells advertisements. Have I broken the agreement?
It seems like the county is getting greedy. There is value to the information provided and they should be fairly compensated for producing the information. But $60,000 a year seems a little out of bounds.